swap to chronological order of most recently modified
-
this is the biggest thing I’ve painted yet with the oil pastels; gonna be working in it for a while



i was looking at digital paintings from 2022, and thinking about the method I had started using back then of having a mark making stage and a blending stage as two separate things; and the oil pastels are letting me start to approximate the same workflow, but on paper! interesting…
-
I am mad about cellphone cameras hiding the processing they do to my photos, and I am glad about software I found that lets me control it and opt in and out.
A breakdown of what I noticed on my Pixel 6 Pro camera and what I used to get around it:
This was initially written on instagram, dictated into the stories feature, so, uh , that’s what I’m putting here, at least to start. As I am still living that partial dominant hand paralysis life, alt text taken from IDs generously written by brianbrianbrian on tumblr.


















Here’s the website for the app I’m getting so much good use out of: https://opencamera.org.uk/ – it’s open source, android only. A comparable app iOS folks have recommended is Camera+, but I don’t think it’s free.
important note! this is an open source app, and that means scammers can copy it, relist it, and fill it with ads or malware. Make sure the version you get is published by Mark Harman, and remember it’s free and you shouldn’t be asked to pay for it on the app store at all.
An example of how much this means to me:
I’ve been really feeling like I’m terrible at photographing my own work, especially watercolour, and i can’t seem to really capture what makes a painting special in person.
Here’s some examples of my attempts to photograph this sketchbook painting using the native camera app on my phone:






no matter the exposure, the lighting, the lens I use, it’s grainy, blotchy, the colours feel off, the contrast is too much… it really doesn’t capture what’s on paper in front of me!
so then i try with the processing turned off in Open Camera:

it’s night and day!
A clearer comparison for you:


To sum up what’s different: the google camera app is trying to reduce noise AND sharpen the image it creates, leading it to both remove actual colour complexity in my painting and then to oversharpen what details it kept. It’s also doing a ton of HDR value-balancing, attempting to even out contrast across the whole image instead of letting some parts be darker and others lighter. In the end, it makes my watercolour painting grainy and high contrast, while removing all the subtle colour and value choices I made while painting.
The open camera photo shows you the nuance that’s in the actual painting – or at least something much closer to it!
what a game changer!
A few notes!
First, this may remind you of a scandal specifically regarding moon photography! You can read more about that here: https://www.theverge.com/2023/3/13/23637401/samsung-fake-moon-photos-ai-galaxy-s21-s23-ultra
Secondly, a lot of folks were confused about why I would need this app when my phone can shoot raw photos in the native app as well! And to that I have a two stage answer!
- Bold of you to assume google has made its raw files pristine. They’re certainly less chewed up than the jpgs, but not all raw files are equal, and these are not great. Google also does not allow raw photography through all three of the lenses – only the main one, as far as I can tell. If I want less processing on a photo I take through the telephoto lens, I need to use OpenCamera to take a jpg photo. Additionally, google’s camera app, evenwhen shooting raw, doesn’t give me any granular control over exposure, focus, ISO or colour. OpenCamera solves many problems at once for me, and shooting raw in the native app solves none of them completely.
- It occurs to me that people who do shoot raw might not understand how inaccessible that can be for folks who don’t! And folks who don’t shoot raw at all might not know what it entails. So I’ve put up a post about what I weigh when deciding whether or not to shoot raw right here: https://www.portablecity.net/what-format-you-might-want-to-save-digital-photos-in/
Finally, I intend to keep growing and cleaning up posts like this as I research and experiment and learn about this stuff! So if you have questions I haven’t answered yet, or suggestions, definitely drop me a comment below so I can follow up.
-
This was a response to an ask on tumblr! The question was:
What format do you recommend I save photographs in? Like raw or jpeg? I don’t know the difference.
Here are my thoughts!
so it depends on what you wanna do with your photo!
if you want to post it right away, you want a jpg; raw files aren’t web-ready and can’t be viewed by various devices easily.
if you want to take a bazillion photos and keep all of them too look at regularly on your phone, you want a jpg; raw files are much, much bigger sized files and will fill up your storage way more quickly, and they don’t actually look good out of the box.
if you like to post-process your photos on your phone or computer, you might prefer raw; jpg files contain only a fraction of the image data that a raw file does (hence the size difference) and it’s much harder to adjust them in ways that look and feel like professional photography.
however: processing a raw file is not optional – you can’t use it till it’s processed, and processing them is a skill you’ll need to give yourself time to practice. They also can require specific software to process them; famously lightroom and photoshop are the industry standards, and they’re pretty $$$, but I bet folks can drop some cheaper options in the notes!
I never shoot only raw, personally, because I love to share photos with friends ASAP, but sometimes I do shoot jpeg & raw together. If you have never tried out shooting and processing raw photos before, this is my recommendation.
Also, shooting raw is great but it’s super not necessary to do if you don’t want to process all your images by hand. There’s a bazillion reasons to take photos different ways, and “convenience” and “speed” are really good ones.
but also: post processing can be fun as heck. try it out! see what you think!
And for fun, on the left here’s a jpg photo straight from my favourite photo app for my phone, Open Camera, and in the middle here it is as an undeveloped raw photo exported directly to jpg, and on the right here is my processed raw photo exported to jpg:



-

New challenge recognized: glossy black fur.
-

finished this piece of a much missed lucky boy; oil pastel on canson mi-tientes paper.
-


working on canson mi-tientes paper, which really let’s the pastel slide around despite the rougher side’s surface texture.
-
how i am doing accidental exposure therapy for my fear of bugs
posted:
updated:
posted to: phototagged: bee, bugs, fly, inaturalist, insects, leaf hopper, moth, nature photography, photography, spider, structureSo I’ve been taking photos of bugs, now that I can trust my phone to not chew up any macro or zoom photography I take, and sharing them onto iNaturalist. it scratches my look I took a photo itch, it scratches my talking about cool things itch, it often tells me what bug I took a photo of, and it connects me with a whole lot of other people who occasionally also look at my photo of a bug and say yep that’s that bug. it’s a really great motivator is what I’m saying. but the best thing about this is that it has completely changed the dance my brain does when it sees a bug.
for context, I am a twitchy and tense person who doesn’t see very well in dim light or out of my peripheral vision, so I am usually very surprised by bugs flapping or running into my field of view — or if I’m very unlucky I hear them first. and because I’m twitchy that often makes me jump, flail, and in general just be stressed. but now, while I might still yell and flail once if I am surprised by a bug, the secondary instinct of taking its photo and putting it on inaturalist to find out what bug it is completely takes over my brain almost immediately. and all of the adrenaline and fear response that I’ve spent a lifetime training myself for just leaves.
The other night I let this little moth climb onto my hand and it let me carry it outside and it was the sweetest interaction I’ve had with a wild animal maybe ever? and while I extremely do not expect to have that kind of interaction with a house centipede or any of the many wasps in my yard, I don’t think I could have had it with a moth either before improving this loop in my brain.
which is to say, if you too do a lot of yelping and freaking out over bugs despite wishing you were not yelping and freaking out at every bug, maybe try taking a photo of more bugs. going out and opting into finding and looking at a bug has made being surprised by them much, much less awful.
Here, also, have some cool bug photos:










-

Can’t resist a backlit forest! I love this especially because it feels like a Paul Saari or George Outhwaite painting.
-

painted on canson mi-tientes pastel paper
2 responses to “Wolf in oil pastel”
-
I love this
-
✨!
-
-
-

I just love the soft glow of artificial lighting on worn tiles!


Leave a Reply