swap to chronological order of most recently posted
-
This is probably my biggest announcement this fall – I’m going to be exhibiting as part of Toronto’s east end art in the park fair!

September 19th and 20th, Toronto folks can find me in tent #55 in East Lynn Park! Weather permitting, I’ll have a huge range of originals that have never been available for purchase before, as well as a wide range of art prints, posters, postcards, and of course my playmap blankets and related goods.

I’m thinking of doing some demos as well, maybe I’ll bring the easel and do some quick plein air studies of East Lynn Park for folks!
Speaking of, I am so excited to show off the large original of my East Lynn Crystal Island painting! I’ll be getting it a nice frame for the occasion and I’m excited to hear what the locals make of it:

Finally, if you are planning to come out for the fair, please say hi! And if you know you’ll be there and have your heart set on a particular painting of mine (the original or a print!) you should let me know in the comments, or via email! I can make sure to have it there for you to see in person if so, and that would make me so happy to do!
-
Short notice but! I have five pieces hanging in Northern Contemporary‘s All the Small Things show, featuring artwork under 12″!

I’m showing three oil pastel pieces and two gouache paintings:

Swans at Dusk
8 x 8″, oil pastel on cradled wood panel, framedWildflower Crystal Island
6 x 6″, oil pastel on wood panel, framed

Produce Glow
8 x 8″, oil pastel on cradled wood panel, exposed finished edgesGrapevine Beetle
8 x 6″, varnished gouache on cradled wood panel, exposed finished edges

Dragon and Island in Pink
8 x 8″, varnished gouache on cradled wood panel, exposed finished edgesI’ve been trying to participate more in local art shows and events this year, because deadlines are a really great tool to get things done, and because otherwise I am not sure I would ever frame any of my work – and it’s so cool to see my artwork properly framed! It really does change it from an object I am personally very, very familiar with, into something special and new and a little magical! I’ll try and document more of the framing process next time I do some at home, because it’s certainly a gauntlet all on its own, but in the meantime, if you’d like to see these five pieces (and a huge host of other amazing artwork) in person, make sure you swing by Northern Contemporary before September 8th!
-

Heads up Toronto folks! As part of the Central Connection art collective, I have six paintings from my 2026 Plein Airpril portfolio hanging in the halls of Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center in Toronto until September 18th! They’ve been beautifully framed (shoutout to Victor Gallery who were hugely helpful with my custom panel sizes!) and they’re six of my favourites – and six of the largest, at 7. 5 x 9″.






I hope they’ve added a little urban magic to the days of staff and patients of the hospital; it’s an honour to get to show work in a place that’s been instrumental in helping me be able to make work again!
Yeah maybe I should write a bit more about that, hey?
So throughout my radial nerve saga, after the surgery itself, I did checkups with not just my surgeon but a whole team of specialists, at Sunnybrook, in their plastic surgery department. (Side note: peripheral nerve surgery is a type of plastic surgery! Who knew! I mean surgeons, obviously, but still, it was news to me.) There were times where I’d be getting an assessment of my nerve regrowth via an EMG machine, and something like eight medical professionals of various stripes would be gathered around discussing what they saw. Someday I’ll talk about the sheer vertiginous surreal absurdity of that situation, but until then, suffice to say I know Sunnybrook spent a lot of time and expertise on making sure I got back as much function as possible in my drawing hand, and it’s pretty magical to know that paintings I did as part of my recovery are now hanging in its halls.
If you encounter them before they come down, let me know how they look!
One response to “Sunnybrook Art Show”
-
these paintings are all so beautiful, i love the first one especially and keep coming back to look at it. i’m so glad that you’ve recovered enough to comfortably make art again! the doctors did amazing work and it’s so cool that you get to pay them back in whatever little way you can. โค
everything you draw makes me so happy.
-
-
A rough concept developed to explore a less utopian solarpunk setting, one where complexities of urban development and resource extraction and labour dynamics haven’t been fully solved, but are still experimenting with integrating with nature in new ways.

-
Over the years I have done a wide spread of illustration work for Call of Cthulhu, focusing on realistic period pieces with a strong horror tone.



























-

After my adventures in soft pastel and gouache this year, I’ve been feeling the urge to go back to oil pastels, especially with what I know now about different paper and texture and how it changes the soft pastels. this painting is a test run of some of the things that I learned about soft pastels being brought into oil pastels, and especially on that level I think it is success.
One of the tricky things about both mediums is that you can’t pre-mix the color before you put it on the canvas. If I have red and blue pastels, and I need purple, I can’t mix red and blue on a palette and see the purple I get before applying it – I have to do the mixing on the page itself and be prepared to modulate it on the page until it hits the exact purple I want. that’s really counterintuitive if you come from painting, especially acrylic or oil painting where mixing on the canvas really just isn’t standard practice. it’s much closer to glazing watercolors than anything else, I think.
When I started using oil pastels last year – or maybe the year before? – I spent a lot of time watching a few different people on YouTube share their process. one of them was Yolanda Blazquez, who does beautiful, very gently and softly blended oil pastel portraiture. I went back this week and rewatched a lot of her videos, and was able to get so much more out of them this time around! it’s wild what context can do!
Her process of building up pigment in many layers, and using the pastels, her hands, and paper stumps to do the blending, makes a lot more sense after I’ve spent half a year getting to know soft pastels as well. I wonder if this is because she herself also uses soft pastels, and if her process in both mediums is a result of the influence of both mediums? either way, while I started this painting with the intent of figuring out how to handle the transparent and opaque variety of my senellier oil pastels, because of the limits of that range and the high key of the photos i chose to reference, it actually became an exercise in figuring out Yolanda’s mixing methods. And now that I have those figured out – or, at least, I’ve dipped my toe in them – I feel a lot more confident tackling things like portraiture myself.
I’m starting a character design workshop this week, it’ll run for the rest of the summer, and while I’m doing that I want to spend some time doing more academic studies of the face and hands, and I think it would be fun to do that in oil pastel! it might also be kind of absurd. we’ll find out!
Also, on the subject of horses, they are hard to draw! I have been working on drawing horses since I was a kid and they remain difficult. I’m not unhappy with this piece as a final, as long as I never look at the reference again. but that is just the way of it with some subjects. further practice is always needed.
21 responses to “Oil Pastel Horses and Mixing Colours”
-
It’s nice when horses take you on a journey.
-
-
Sketching, Lifedrawing and Studies from Early Summer
posted:
updated:
posted to: arttagged: abstract, animal, dragon, fantasy art, gouache, landscape, lifedrawing, newfoundland, oil pastel, painting, portrait, sketchbook, soft pastel, structure, traditional art, watercolour













I’ve been making stuff and it’s been pretty varied! Hard to figure out how to talk about it all except as a big ol’ artdump, so, here! Have some art!
24 responses to “Sketching, Lifedrawing and Studies from Early Summer”
-
Lovely to see these all in one place
-
wow the water in the tiger piece is gorgeous! the nighttime pieces are my favorite, too. the way you color reflections is really lovely.
-
-
Inspired by symbolist painters.

8 responses to “Sword and Sorcery Character Portrait”
-
Forest Adventurers – Watercolour Illustration
posted:
updated:
tagged: adin, art, bear, forest, orin, painting, structure, traditional art, watercolor, watercolourDrawn from memories of new growth in forests recovering from floods, making use of Windsor & Newton and Daniel Smith watercolours. Pigments used include green apatite genuine and fuchsite, adding a shimmer to the painting in person.

click here to buy a print of this piece 
7 responses to “Forest Adventurers – Watercolour Illustration”
-
wanna read the comics themselves? They’re up on my stories website for free: stories.portablecity.net/stories/comi…
-
-
Okay, this first in-depth cellphone photography post is going to be about white balance.
One of the things that I often struggle with is getting the colors to look right on my phone. If you’ve ever tried to photograph a sunset, or anything at twilight, or anything in a dramatically lit room, you might have noticed your digital camera on your phone kind of taking the juice out of the colors a bit. There are lots of complexities to how cameras capture color, and I’m not about to give you a magic answer that solves every problem, but the understanding that I’m about to share here was a huge help for me and has made it a lot easier to get colours on my phone camera much closer to what I can see in front of me.

sunset with most of the image feeling very grey 
sunset with most of the image feeling very colourful and pink and orange White balance as a term is referring to how the camera is assigning colors to what you see in front of you. Unfortunately it turns out that color perception is a relative phenomenon, and while we do know the wavelengths for particular colours, the way that our eyes perceive those colours is not fixed and absolute.
To get maximum information out of any scene our brains tend to move color around a bit. If you’ve ever been in a room lit only with red, and then stepped outside into a room lit by a white light, you might have felt colors move and shift a bit on you. Probably the easiest way to prove this to yourself is to close one eye and use the other eye to look only at something very red for a full minute. Then close the red eye, open the other eye and flip between them to see how your brain is trying to deal with this dramatically different input.
Enough about brains though, we’re here to talk about cameras.
So firstly: a digital camera is not necessarily able to capture the entire breadth of colour in the visible spectrum. (Have you heard of non-photo blue pencils or ink or paint? It’s called that because it really doesn’t photograph well.)
Your digital camera also (along with any and all digital displays) cannot display the entire breadth of colour in the visible spectrum. It can display even less than it can capture, I believe.
FYI: the subset of colours that a given technology, medium, or such can display, compute, capture, etc, is called its gamut. Your screen has a gamut; a printer has a gamut; the human eye has a gamut; a bird eye has a gamut; your watercolour palette has a gamut. The gamut describes the colour hues (if it’s red, yellow, green, blue, etc), the colour vibrance or saturation (how intense it is, or how greyed out it is), and the colour values (how light or dark it is) that can be displayed or captured.
Now, while our brains can shift the emphasis of colours around a bit, we do perceive the full breadth of the visible spectum (under ideal circumstances and with full use of all rods and cones in our eyes, which is not universal), but digital cameras? Because of their reduced display gamut, they have to choose which colours to discard, combine, ignore, etc, to squeeze more data down into what you see on screen.
They have to translate from the spectrum we built them to perceive, down into the display gamut.
That choice / that translation is called the white balance.

image taken on a cloudy day with the white balance set to “incandescent” – giving everything a blue cast 
image taken on a cloudy day with the white balance set to “overcast” revealing more accurate, maybe even slightly warm colours Digital cameras usually offer automatic white balance, and specific white balance settings. Specific settings could be descriptive, like โdaylightโ or โincandescent lightโ or โfluorescent lightโ, or they might have a temperature number you can set.
That number, as I understand it and I’m sure there’s specifics I’m not aware of or I’m missing here so, you know, feel free to do a lot more reading on this if you’re interested, but as I understand it the number is a temperature in kelvins that tells us what colour the light is based on the heat of the source.

wikipedia’s light temperature chart – click through for so, so much more info Different types of light sources match with the light produced at different temperatures, and this is why someone might talk about light’s temperature, warm or cool. Unfortunately things there are a little backwards, thanks to chaotic english verbal metaphors.
So a candle, which produces a very warm-feeling reddish light, is throwing what is actually a very low temperature light. The sun, which when it is directly overhead produces a very bright white light, is a very high temperature. Different types of artificial lighting like incandescent, halogen, fluorescent etc exist along the temperature scale, but it’s a little bit more complex than that – some lightbulbs produce multiple bands of coloured light.
If you’d like to learn more about light temperature, and light sources, I definitely recommend James Gurney’s book Color and Light. It’s for painters, but anyone who makes images from life could benefit from the robustly researched scientific info on how we see the world around us.

the white balance settings in Open Camera on my google pixel 6 pro 
the temperature slider in adobe lightroom I don’t have examples of the temperature slider as a white balance tool in my open camera screenshots, though, as my Google pixel 6 pro’s camera API doesn’t let the app Open Camera access that setting, and when I try, it only shows me a black screen. This is an API barrier Google has set up on its phone camera driver – even though the camera absolutely is taking photos using this info, the driver API hasn’t exposed it to outside software to control.
It will, however, thankfully, let me choose between fixed descriptive white balance settings! Everything from Incandescent to Twilight and back again. Each of these settings is associated with what I will call a colour profile, which tells the camera how warm or cool to expect the incoming light to be, on average, and how to then translate it.
Wait, wait, though, I think I’ve skipped a key concept here, hold on.
Let’s go back to that reddish firelight.

If you light a scene with a flame, say in a campfire or on a candle, you know it’s giving everything a warm glow, right? The way it’s doing that is: the light produced by the flame is itself made of mostly red and yellow wavelengths of light. It’s not producing any light on the blue wavelengths.
The way we, or a camera, perceive color is by coloured wavelengths being reflected off the object we’re looking at. The object doesn’t create the coloured light, it requires light of the right color to hit it for the colours of the object to be visible. Sunlight, white light, contains the full spectrum of colours, and so in bright sunlight the light itself shows us all the potential colours – which means it changes none of them, which means the light itself feels white.
When the flame on a candle produces light, it’s mostly producing red and yellow light, which means if it encounters a red object, it shows us the red, but if it encounters a green object, it can only show us the molecules inside that green color that are yellow, and the molecules inside that green that are blue don’t reflect any light. To our eyes, this tints the object yellowish in the candlelight.
However, if you stay a long time in a room lit only by candles, you probably feel like you can see green and blue and purple colours a little still. As I understand it (and my neurologist family members will I’m sure be haunted by this maybe oversimplified info so please follow the rabbit hole here if you’re curious, it’s really interesting stuff!) this is your brain compensating for the tinted information by shifting your identification of colours, maybe to try and help you discern as much information as possible from the limited visual data. You don’t stop knowing it’s warm light, but you adjust to it.
As an example, and here I’m talking about your eyes, remember, not the camera tech yet (we’ll get back to it shortly), here is a photo of a candle.

First off, let me assuage your dress-related paranoia – this is a teal candle.
To me, looking at the photo, this is clearly a teal candle. You can see it’s a lovely seafoam green at the top where it’s warmer and glowing through the melted wax, and a much more vibrant blue farther down, away from the flame.
So let’s take a closer look at these colours! I have isolated a few into bigger dots and overlaid them on the image where they were eyedroppered from:

And here are the same colours just on a neutral 50% grey background.

Here I have eyedroppered that brightest blue in the dots, the one on the bottom right of the image. This is how blue it is: not very blue! Pretty green still! Because that candle’s light cannot show us blue and purple wavelengths, we end up with an image where a cold green-grey starts to feel blue.

Our eyes work to compensate in limited-colour situations. We’re actually really good at it! And anyone who makes art commercially, anyone who designs colour for film and tv, advertising, fashion, games, etc? They all know this and use it when creating images. It’s why, given full colour vision, at a candlelit dinner, you can still tell your green veggies from your red ones.
And it’s not at all new! You can see this in Georges de La Tourโs famous candlelit paintings. The brightest light feels white, and colours still have some vibrance to them, and the scene feels rich, but, there’s no actual blues on the canvas, even though we have no trouble identifying the woman’s dress as light blue:

Georges de La Tour โ Saint Anne with the Christ Child
1645-50So what does this have to do with camera white balance?
Sorry for the detour but it’s a useful comparison.
Your eyes can likely perceive all of the visible spectrum. (It’s called the visible spectrum because it is the spectrum of light visible to human anatomy. as mentioned above, that anatomy varies.)
Digital cameras, however, are not able to do that. They have to pick a subset of the colours in the scene to translate into their digital gamut, and they are very good at doing that convincingly.
So when you pick a light temperature, or a fixed white balance setting like โincandescentโ, you’re telling your camera how to translate the light it receives into the digital spectrum.
I’ve taken some example snaps here to help illustrate this point. In this scene you can see some incandescent lightbulbs, and a window out to a cloudy overcast afternoon sky.
As i switch between white balance settings, watch which parts of the image are more or less colourful, and which colours get neutralized to white.


A quick note on how these settings are named. “Incandescent” is named that because it’s a great setting to neutralize the warm glow your scene would have if lit only by incandescent bulbs. You can see, above, how the bulbs appear to be throwing a cold white light. In contrast, the cold light from outside now looks REALLY cold – almost twilight blue – because the translation is being applied to the entire image evenly.


Fluorescent, then, is designed to compensate for the colour shift that fluorescent lighting applies to a scene. Since there’s no fluorescent lights in my composition, nothing feels neutral or white, and instead it all feels pink and purple.


“Warm” is maybe a bad name for this setting, but as far as I can tell it’s a setting in-between Fluorescent and Daylight. It doesn’t neutralize anything in my composition too much, but you can see it is still doing some compensation for the incandescent bulbs and string lights, making them more neutral in colour than the blue outdoor light.


By contrast the Daylight setting neutralizes that outdoor light in the window very successfully, and you can see how that makes the incandescent bulbs appear quite yellow in comparison.


The Cloudy setting even starts to make the outdoor light feel a bit warm, kind of greenish-yellow, and the incandescent bulbs start to feel warmer too, more buttery citrusy orange.


The Twilight setting is designed to compensate for that grey-blue light you get just after the sun has set, and since none of the light in this scene is anywhere near that cold, everything indoors and out is feeling orange.


The Shade setting would be perfect at compensating for when you are photographing something that’s in the shade on an otherwise clear, sunny day – on those days, if the subject is out of the sun, it will be lit only by the blue sky, an incredibly cold blue light source. Since nothing in our composition is anywhere near that kind of cold blue light, everything is feeling orange and red.
I hope that’s a good example of what these fixed settings are and what each is doing to the image!
Note that in each of these settings, the camera has a fixed translation value it’s using. When I’m using a fixed setting like this, i know the translation value isn’t changing even if i take it from a daylight scene to a lamplit scene. This means, it’s showing me the difference between the daylight and the lamplight.
Here you can see how the Incandescent setting interprets a cloudy afternoon shot and a lamplit indoor shot:




But most digital cameras are set to auto white balance by default, and how much they let you change that can vary wildly. As I mentioned, my Google pixel 6 pro, with its very hyped up camera, doesn’t let me set temperature specific white balance, which sucks! But at least the qualitative settings like Incandescent and Daylight are still fixed.
So let’s talk about auto white balance.


So you might see that the auto setting doesn’t quite match any of the colour of the fixed settings demonstrated above. Auto white balance is calculated in response to what the camera is looking at in that moment, and it’s recalculated as you move your camera around.
Here is how the Auto setting interprets the same cloudy afternoon and lamplit indoor scenes from above:




The digital camera is attempting to detect the light colour in the scene you’re showing it, and translate the colours accordingly. From looking at these, I believe that this means that it is looking to see if there’s a dominant colour in the scene, and adjusting the translation settings to better balance out the colour distribution. This can be great for scenes where your subject matter contains a full spectrum of colours within it that all simply are being tinted by the light – say taking a photo of a bunch of friends in a restaurant at night.
Where this Auto setting lets me down is when I’m trying to take a photo of something with a very strong single colour in it – for example, a rich orange sunset. It also tends to fail at capturing the magic of something like golden hour lighting, or dramatic surreal lighting like neon etc. To do its job, it actively neutralizes what can sometimes be, in my opinion, the best part of a given scene.
If you’re having trouble getting your phone to capture the colours in sunset photos, concert photos, dusk photos, etc, i definitely recommend playing around with more fixed white balance settings.
You can really transform a photo by changing the white balance!




Personally, I’ve stopped using auto white balance entirely.
I usually prefer to have my camera colour settings stay fixed and to then learn how to use those settings to my advantage in different scenarios. Most days I set my cellphone camera to Daylight white balance and shoot everything from there.
This was a technique i learned from this YouTube video:
In here, Sean Tucker mentions that, if you shoot with film, you don’t get to adjust the white balance on each shot – the white balance is instead part of the film and development process, and most colour camera film is white balanced for daylight. This is why all my old film photos had such a rich warm tint on all the incandescent-lit photos, and a cool, almost purple feel on very overcast, cloudy days.
Here, a few of my favourites from my film days:




Now, while I cannot afford to shoot film all the time, I’m happy to indulge my nostalgia if it gets me excited about making more art, so setting my phone to daylight white balance it is!
Taking my camera out and shooting from midday to fully dark really showed me how this setting interprets different light scenarios, and frankly i love it. Much easier to imagine I’m painting with light if the light stops sliding around the colour spectrum, yknow?




A quick aside about RAW.
Raw photos contain more data than they can make visible. You can shoot a raw photo on whatever white balance setting you like, and the photo will still contain more colours than the condensed and translated selection it shows you. When you open it in specific RAW development software, you’ll be able to adjust the white balance hugely and it really barely matters what settings you used in the first place.
If you’re not shooting RAW, however, your photos can still be adjusted a bit, temperature-wise, but whatever colours got fully neutralized by the white balance settings will stay neutral, as digitally, neutral means that little or no colour data got embedded there. This is why it’s so hard to recover a sunset photo when the camera turned the sky white instead of yellow. There’s no colour info to un-translate in the first place.
This will come up again when i talk more about exposure settings, in a future post!
So this is a wall of text about white balance.
Thanks for reading!
If you’ve got questions, or corrections, or more info on the subject, I’d love it if you dropped that in the comments below! And if you’re having fun playing around with white balance in your own work, I’d really love to see it!
6 responses to “Cellphone Photography: All About White Balance”
-
Hey, I absolutely love reading your photography posts! I don’t do a lot of photography, but it’s great info for artists too. Your breakdowns and examples are super clear. Also it’s a delight to just read a website again!
-
ahh heck Matt, thanks for reading it! I def approach photos as a painter first as well. And man, I am really liking writing and reading on websites these days!
-

Leave a Reply